Several years ago , Randy Guijarro paid $ 2 for a few old photographs he find in an oldtimer shop in Fresno , California . In 2015 , it was influence that one of those photos — allege to be the second verified painting ever found of Billy the fry — could bring in the golden thrifter as much as$5 million . That tale now sound familiar to Frank Abrams , a attorney from North Carolina who purchased his own photo of the legendary malefactor at a flea food market in 2011 . It turns out that the tintype , which he paid $ 10 for , is recollect to be an mental image of Billy and Pat Garrett ( the sheriff who would eventually kill him ) taken in 1880 . Like Guijarro ’s find , experts say Abrams ’s exposure could be deserving millions .

The find is as much a surprise to Abrams as anyone . AsThe New York Timesreports , what trace Abrams to the exposure was the fact that it was a tintype , a metallic element photographic image that was popular in the Wild West . Abrams did n’t recognize any of the man in the image , but he liked it and hung it on a rampart in his home , which is where it was when an Airbnb Edgar Guest joked that it might be a photo of Jesse James . He was n’t too far off .

Using Google as his chief enquiry tool , Abrams essay to determine out if there was any celebrated grimace in that photo , and rapidly realized that it was Pat Garrett . According toThe New York Times :

Article image

Abrams , who is a reprehensible defense attorney , described the process of investigating the story of the photo as consanguineal to “ take on the biggest case you could ever imagine . ” And while he ’s thrilled that his epic flea mart uncovering could produce a major monetary gravy , do n’t expect to see the image hitting the auction block any fourth dimension shortly .

" Other people , they need to speculate from here to land issue forth , ” Abrams toldThe New York Timesof how much the picture , which he has not yet had valuate , might be deserving . “ I do n’t experience what it ’s deserving . I jazz account . It ’s a privilege to have something like this . ”

[ h / t : The New York Times ]